Original Papers

نویسندگان

  • Aleksandra Gruszka
  • Daniel Bor
  • Roger R. Barker
  • Edward Necka
  • Adrian M. Owen
چکیده

Idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD) impairs working memory, but the exact nature of this deficit in terms of the underlying cognitive mechanisms is not well understood. In this study patients with mild clinical symptoms of PD were compared with matched healthy control subjects on a computerized battery of tests designed to assess spatial working memory and verbal working memory. In the spatial working memory task, subjects were required to recall a sequence of four locations. The verbal working memory task was methodologically identical except for the modality of the stimuli used, requiring subjects to orally recall a sequence of six digits. In either case, half of the sequences were structured in a way that allowed ‘chunking’, while others were unstructured. This manipulation was designed to dissociate the strategic component of task performance from the memory-load component. Mild medicated patients with PD were impaired only on the structured versions of the verbal working memory tasks. The analogous deficit in the spatial working memory was less pronounced. These findings are in agreement with the hypothesis that working memory deficits in PD reflect mainly the executive component of the tasks and that the deficits may be at least partly modality-independent.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

We Have an Inflation of Review Papers—for what Are Reviews Good?

In recent years more and more reviews have been published, and journal editors aggressively woo authors to submit such scripts. What are the reasons? One is that the flood of original scientific papers is overwhelming. Many researchers feel overburdened to read all original papers they wish to read, in particular, papers on the edge of the own research field. This generates a demand for good re...

متن کامل

A Tribute to Exciting Biology

valuable resource of information about the current How do we pay homage to 30 years of great biology in Cell? This was the question that the editorial team faced standing of research in the featured areas. when we first began thinking about how best to cele-To accompany the original research papers, we have brate the journal's anniversary this month. After consid-asked the authors of each of th...

متن کامل

"Eigenlob": self-citation in biomedical journals.

The number of citations to previous work of an individual scientist has been considered, in part, to be an important indicator of academic performance in research. Some of these citations, of course, are to the author’s own work; the Germans call this “Eigenlob,” or self-praise. We analyzed data obtained from 340 papers (294 original articles and 46 review papers) in a sample of leading biomedi...

متن کامل

What do we discuss at IAPS meetings ? An appraisal of free paper sessions at the 30 th annual conference

Background: The traditional belief that attending medical conferences would further one’s knowledge needs to be examined critically. Although analytical reports on the effectiveness of conferences have been published from Western countries, such studies have never been conducted in India. Materials and Methods: The author prospectively analyzed 100 free papers presented at the 30th National Con...

متن کامل

Analysis of the structure of original research papers: an aid to writing original papers for publication.

BACKGROUND An increasing number of people involved in medicine are under pressure to publish research, but there is little understanding of how to describe structured writing. AIM This paper aims to describe the structure of original research papers published in the British Journal of General Practice with a view to providing insight into the nature of such analyses, and particularly to help ...

متن کامل

CrossCheck data of manuscripts submitted to Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

ticles” and “Case Reports” was 13% and 20%, respectively, suggesting a higher similarity index for case reports. Original articles and case reports had a mean similarity of 13% and 13%, whereas that of rejected original articles was 22% and that of rejected case reports was 30%.(Fig. 1) The reported similarity does not directly correlate with plagiarism, but high similarity can reflect unintent...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016